Adequate management of any conflict of interest that could cause the performance of the functions of the compliance officer, guaranteeing that there is an operational separation between the administrative body and the members. Of the control body”. There is no doubt that the actions carried out by the fc barcelona board are far from what is ethically correct. The lack of transparency in making public a couple of pages of a "forensic report" of some 200 is remarkable. It is pertinent to point out that a "forensic report" has the specialty of being an investigation carried out "ad hoc" on very specific issues limited to the scope stipulated by the applicant.
It is therefore not surprising that the mossos d'esquadra concluded in the summary, to which the efe news agency has had access, that the report made "is insufficient due to the division of information" and "and due to the lack of depth in the pwc assignment”. Likewise, the pressure exerted by the former president on the club's compliance officer, trying to subordinate whatsapp number list the parallel investigation to his prior authorization, also requesting to be informed about the people involved, the scope and the objective of said investigation, are a clear sign that the pillars on which a supervisory and control body,
independence and autonomy, have to rest, were shaken, putting at risk the impartiality and neutrality of the compliance officer. The “barçagate” thus reflects the harsh reality that compliance officers face these professionals suffer significant pressure in the performance of their duties and work with the fear of suffering reprisals if they investigate irregularities by senior officials of the organization, as occurred in the present case. The credibility of fc barcelona as an institution is at stake. The reputational damage that the blaugrana club is